“My Family Would Crucify Me!”: The Perceived impact of Social Pressure on Cross-Cultural and Interfaith Dating and Marriage

“My Family Would Crucify Me!”: The Perceived impact of Social Pressure on Cross-Cultural and Interfaith Dating and Marriage


The current research examined the observed impact of parental and social stress on people’ perceptions regarding cross-cultural and interfaith dating and wedding. The concerns of great interest had been: (1) what’s the impact of parental attitudes towards interfaith and relationships that are cross-cultural? (2) how can the individuals feel it impacts upon them? And finally, (3) How do the individuals predict they shall react to their children’s range of such relationships? Fifty-five college pupils with diverse backgrounds took part in this research. The findings indicate that almost all the individuals had been impacted by the social stress placed upon them. Furthermore, the individuals observed the generation that is previous “racist”. But, interestingly you will find signs of a generational mindset change. Finally, the findings reveal that more than 80 percent of this individuals would not would you like to interfere inside their children’s partner selection. The residual 20 per cent had been against interfaith and dating that is cross-cultural marriages.

This might be a preview of registration content, access via your organization.

Access choices

Buy article that is single

Immediate access to your article PDF that is full.

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Contribute to journal

Immediate on line access to all the presssing problems from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

Tax calculation shall be finalised during checkout.


It ought to be noted that relationship is generally speaking maybe perhaps perhaps not appropriate into the Arab and Muslim community (among others) unless the couple’s intention would be to date solely (but, specific limitations may nevertheless use, e.g., limiting intimate activities) along with the seek to get hitched. Furthermore, in some instances, the approval for the female’s daddy ( or any other significant male figure) is had a need to enable this relationship to transpire. This matter had been addressed through the number of the info so that you can respect individuals’ social traditions and religious observing.


Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial discussion: Uncertainty, understanding, plus the growth of social relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and psychology that is socialpp. 122–144). Oxford: Blackwell.

Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal interaction: Theoretical perspectives, future leads. Journal of correspondence, 55(3), 415–447.

Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? a longitudinal test for the contact theory among bulk and minority teams in three europe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843.

Boker, A. (2008). Kiryat Gat: Racist campaign against Bedouin guys dating women that are jewish. nana10. Retrieved 31, 2013, from http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=563227 december.

Bost, S. (2010). Mulattas and mestizas: Representing identities that are mixed the Americas, 1850–2000. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Changing information that is qualitative Thematic analysis and rule development. Ny, NY: Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative analysis in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

Cila, J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013). Personal openness toward interfaith dating and wedding among Muslim teenagers: The part of religiosity, social identification, and family members connectedness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430213502561.

Cohen, A. B. (2009). Numerous kinds of tradition. US Psychologist, 64, 194–204.

Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic views on sex while the social context of love and closeness. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 53–59.

Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental disturbance and love that is romantic the Romeo and Juliet impact. Journal of Personality and Social Structure, 24, 1–10.

Eggert, L. L., & Parks, M. R. (1987). Correspondence community involvement in adolescents’ friendships and relationships that are romantic. Correspondence Yearbook, 10, 283–322.

Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t rest around like White girls do”: Family, tradition, and gender in Filipina American life. Indication, 26, 415–440.

Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., & Hoffman, N. G. (2012). Predictors of friend approval for intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–15.

Felmlee, D. (2003). Conversation in internet sites. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 389–409). Ny: Plenum.

Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Intimate partners’ perceptions of social networking features using the passing of relationship and time transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.

Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and design that is qualitative academic research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Harris, T. M., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of competition for starting a partnership. Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–64.

Hollingshead, A. B. (1950). Social factors within the variety of wedding mates. United States Sociological Review, 15, 619–627.

Kalmijn, M. (1998). Homogamy and intermarriage: Reasons, patterns, styles. Yearly Review of Sociology, 395–421.

Lasson, K. (2008). Bloodstains on a Code of Honor: The Murderous Marginalization of Women in the Islamic World. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 30, 407.

Lewis, R. (1973). Social effect while the development of dyads: An interactionist approach to mate selection. Sociometry, 34, 409–418.

Madek, C. A. (2005). Killing dishonor: Effective eradication of honor killing. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 29, 53.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to create and implementation. London: Wiley.

Moore, R. M. (2000). An exploratory research of interracial dating on a college campus that is small. Sociological Viewpoints, 16, 46–64 colombiancupid reviews.

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence companies plus the growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10, 55–79.

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence sites in addition to growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10(1), 55–79.

Reich, W. A., Ramos, J. M., & Jaipal, R. (2000). Ethnic identification and interethnic dating in Portuguese teenagers. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 153–161.

Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and social help determinants of relationship dedication. Personal Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.

Sprecher, S. (2011). The impact of social networking sites on intimate relationships: Through the lens regarding the network that is social. Personal Relationships, 18(4), 630–644.

Telles, E. E., & Sue, C. A. (2009). Race combination: Boundary crossing in relative viewpoint. Sociology, 35(1), 129.

Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and types of qualitative meeting studies. Nyc: The Complimentary Press.

Yahya, S., Bekerman, Z., Sagy, S., & Boag, S. (2012). Whenever training satisfies conflict: Palestinian and Jewish–Israeli parental attitudes towards comfort education that is promoting. Journal of Peace Education, 9, 297–320.

Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-a). Facets affecting attitudes towards cross-cultural and interfaith relationship and wedding. Marriage and Family Review.

Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-b). “Sadly, not absolutely all love affairs are designed to be…” Attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages in a conflict-ridden area. Center East Journal.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shopping Cart